Can AI help improve security culture?

I’ve been exploring the current application of machine learning techniques to cybersecurity. Although, there are some strong use cases in the areas of log analysis and malware detection, I couldn’t find the same quantity of research on applying AI to the human side of cybersecurity.

Can AI be used to support the decision-making process when developing cyber threat prevention mechanisms in organisations and influence user behaviour towards safer choices? Can modelling adversarial scenarios help us better understand and protect against social engineering attacks?

To answer these questions, a multidisciplinary perspective should be adopted with technologists and psychologists working together with industry and government partners.

While designing such mechanisms, consideration should be given to the fact that many interventions can be perceived by users as negatively impacting their productivity, as they demand additional effort to be spent on security and privacy activities not necessarily related to their primary activities [1, 2].

A number of researchers use the principles from behavioural economics to identify cyber security “nudges” (e.g.  [3], [4]) or visualisations [5,6].  This approach helps them make better decisions and minimises perceived effort by moving them away from their default position. This method is being applied in the privacy area, for example for reduced Facebook sharing [7] and improved smartphone privacy settings [8]. Additionally there is greater use of these as interventions, particularly with installation of mobile applications [9].

The proposed socio-technical approach to the reduction of cyber threats aims to account for the development of responsible and trustworthy people-centred AI solutions that can use data whilst maintaining personal privacy.

A combination of supervised and unsupervised learning techniques is already being employed to predict new threats and malware based on existing patterns. Machine learning techniques can be used to monitor system and human activity to detect potential malicious deviations.

Building adversarial models, designing empirical studies and running experiments (e.g. using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk) can help better measure the effectiveness of attackers’ techniques and develop better defence mechanisms. I believe there is a need to explore opportunities to utilise machine learning to aid the human decision-making process whereby people are supported by, and work together with, AI to better defend against cyber attacks.

We should draw upon participatory co-design and follow a people-centred approach so that relevant stakeholders are engaged in the process. This can help develop personalised and contextualised solutions, crucial to addressing ethical, legal and social challenges that cannot be solved with AI automation alone.

More

How to be a trusted advisor

Being a security leader is first and foremost acting as a trusted advisor to the business. This includes understanding its objectives and aligning your efforts to support and enable delivery on the wider strategy.

It is also about articulating cyber risks and opportunities and working with the executive team on managing them. This doesn’t mean, however, that your role is to highlight security weaknesses and leave it to the board to figure it all out. Instead, being someone they can turn to for advice is the best way to influence the direction and make the organisation more resilient in combating cyber threats.

For your advice to be effective, you first need to earn the right to offer it. One of the best books I’ve read on the subject is The Trusted Advisor by David H. Maister. It’s not a new book and it’s written from the perspective of a professional services firm but that doesn’t mean the lessons from it can’t be applied in the security context. It covers the mindset, attributes and principles of a trusted advisor.

Unsurprisingly, the major focus of this work is on developing trust. The author summarises his views on this subject in the trust equation:

Trust = (Credibility + Reliability + Intimacy) / Self-Orientation

It’s a simple yet powerful representation of what contributes to and hinders the trust building process.

It’s hard to trust someone’s recommendations when they don’t put our interests first and instead are preoccupied with being right or jump to solutions without fully understanding the problem.

Equally, as important credibility is, the long list of your professional qualifications and previous experience on its own is not sufficient to be trustworthy. Having courage and integrity, following through on your promises and active listening, among other things are key. In the words of Maister, “it is not enough to be right, you must also be helpful”.

How to apply FBI’s behavioural change stairway to security

Unlike the FBI’s Hostage Negotiation Team, cyber security professionals are rarely involved in high-stakes negotiations involving human life. But that doesn’t mean they can’t use some of the techniques developed by them to apply it to improve security culture, overcome resistance and guide organisational change.

Behind the apparent simplicity, this model is a tried and tested way to influence human behaviour over time. The crux of it is that you can’t skip any steps as consecutive efforts build on the previous ones. The common mistake many cyber security professionals make is they jump straight to Influence or Behavioral change with phishing simulations or security awareness campaigns but this can be counterproductive. 

As explained in the original paper, it is recommended to invest time in active listening, empathy and establishing rapport first. In the security context, this might mean working with the business stakeholders to understand their objectives and concerns, rather than sowing fear of security breaches and regulatory fines.

All of this doesn’t mean you have to treat every interaction like a hostile negotiation or treat your business executives as violent felons. The aim is to build trust to be able to best support the business not manipulate your way into getting your increased budget signed off.I cover some techniques in The Psychology of Information Security – feel free to check it out if you would like to learn more.

Guest lecture at Hull University Business School

I had the pleasure to deliver a guest lecture to students of Hull University Business School. I spoke about current cybersecurity trends and what they meant to the businesses. I also used this opportunity to talk about various career paths one can explore while starting in or transitioning into security.

There is a misconception that you have to have a technical background to be successful in cybersecurity. In reality through, the field is so broad and roles can be so varied that the diversity of backgrounds, skills, experiences and perspectives is essential to help organisations across the world be more secure. Arguably, communication skills and understanding of the business can be more valuable in certain contexts than a proficiency in a narrow vendor-specific technology.

There are a lot of transferable skills one can bring to the profession regardless of their prior cybersecurity knowledge and I urge everyone who is considering a transition into this field to reflect on how they can contribute.

Business alignment framework for security

In my previous blogs on the role of the CISO, CISO’s first 100 days and developing security strategy and architecture, I described some of the points a security leader should consider initially while formulating an approach to supporting an organisation. I wanted to build on this and summarise some of the business parameters in a high-level framework that can be used as a guide to learn about the company in order to tailor a security strategy accordingly.

This framework can also be used as a due diligence cheat sheet while deciding on or prioritising potential opportunities – feel free to adapt it to your needs.

More

I’ve been named a CSO30 Awards 2020 winner

I am excited to be recognised as one of the top security executives who have demonstrated outstanding thought leadership and business value.

The winners of the CSO30 Award “demonstrated risk and security excellence in helping guide their organisations through the challenges of COVID19, worked to secure digital transformation initiatives, strengthen security awareness and education efforts, utilize new security technologies, engage with the wider security community to share learnings, and much more.”

It’s a team effort and I’m proud to be working with great professionals helping businesses innovate while managing risks.

How to secure a business in decline

Many business have felt the economic impact of the Covid pandemic. Depending on the industry, some managed to adapt and pivot to new models and ways of working, but not all were successful.

As a result, some companies were unable to continue to operate profitably and entered administration. The cause of financial troubles, however, doesn’t have to be pandemic-related to pose new security challenges.

In this blog I would like to share some of the priority areas for a security leader in a business in, sometimes rapid, decline.

As the business is failing, the leadership might not treat cyber security as their top priority. However, the organisation still has obligations to its customers who entrusted the company with their data and comply with relevant laws and regulations. It goes without saying that previously identified cyber security threats and risks are unlikely to disappear either.

If there is a chance of survival, a poorly managed security incident can be the last straw.

How should security teams adapt? What should they focus on?

Broadly speaking, there are two main areas a CISO can support the business: securing a potential rescue deal and managing the decline.

There are investors specialising in distressed businesses and part of the administration process might involve looking for a capital injection or an acquisition of a failing company.

Potential investors would understandably need to know what they might be buying which normally involves conducting due diligence on the target. Although circumstances are different, the process itself is very similar to an M&A scenario or a startup acquisition.

As a security leader, it’s your job to provide transparency on the matters related to data protection, past breaches and existing security controls and processes. If done right, it presents the business in a favourable light as a well-governed enterprise, increasing investors’ confidence and therefore chances of a successful rescue deal.

In many ways, this is comparable to overseeing a divestment. A lot of such conversations are confidential, so raising awareness of what can and can’t be shared externally (including on social media), and maintaining appropriate need-to-know access controls is paramount.

Some things, however, are outside of our control and sometimes all we can do is to make the best out of a bad situation.

There are a few key areas to pay attention to when it comes to embedding security for a business in downturn.

People. There will naturally be a lot of leavers, so having a robust joiner-mover-leaver process is key. All access permissions should be timely revoked when no longer required. In addition, data loss prevention controls and broader insider risks should be considered as the morale in the company worsens. On a positive note, people and a culture of security can significantly contribute to the company’s security posture, especially in the conditions of scarce resources (see next point).

Resources. Investment in security is going to understandably diminish. Some of the top talent will leave, so you will have to learn to do more with less. If your desired control to mitigate a particular risk is no longer affordable, what is the next best thing? Can this be done cheaper, or better still, for free? Business leadership should be made aware of the potential consequences of risk acceptances, and there will likely be a higher than usual number of these.

Data. There also might not be enough money to pay for non business critical systems and services. These should be decommissioned in the way that ensures that sensitive (including personal) data is destroyed securely in line with company’s retention policies. Having data maps and asset inventories is invaluable to maintain visibility.

Sustaining operational resilience in the face of cost pressure is challenging but not impossible. For many, it’s a unique learning experience regardless of the outcome.

Cyber incident readiness

As many organisations are recognising and experiencing first-hand, cyber-attacks are no longer a matter of if, but when. Recent cyber breaches at major corporations highlight the increasing sophistication, stealth, and persistence of cyber-attacks that organisations are facing today. These breaches are resulting in increased regulatory and business impact.

More

Cyber security in the Oil & Gas industry

Energy

Oil & Gas has always been an industry affected by a wide range of geopolitical, economical and technological factors. The energy transition is one of the more recent macro trends impacting every player in the sector.

Companies are adjusting their business models and reorganising their organisational structures to prepare for the shift to renewable energy. They are becoming more integrated, focusing on consumers’ broader energy needs all the while reducing carbon emissions and addressing sustainability concerns.

To enable this, the missing capabilities get acquired and unwanted assets get divested. Cyber security has a part to play during divestments. preventing business disruption and data leaks during handover. In acquisition scenarios, supporting due diligence and secure integration becomes a focus.

Digital transformation is also high on many boards’ agenda. While cyber security experts are still grappling with the convergence of Information Technology (IT) and Operational Technology (OT) domains, new solutions are being tried out: drones are monitoring for environmental issues, data is being collected from IoT sensors and crunched in the Cloud with help of machine learning.  These are deployed alongside existing legacy systems in the geographically distributed infrastructure, adding complexity and increasing attack surface.

It’s hard, it seems, to still get the basics right. Asset control, vulnerability and patch management, network segregation, supply chain risks and poor governance are the problems still waiting to be solved.

The price for neglecting security can be high: devastating ransomware crippling global operations, industrial espionage and even a potential loss of human life as demonstrated by recent cyberattacks.

It’s not all doom and gloom, however. There are many things to be hopeful for. Oil & Gas is an industry with a strong safety culture. The same processes are often applied in both an office and an oil rig. People will actually intervene and tell you off if you are not holding the handrail or carrying a cup of coffee without a lid.

To be effective, cyber security needs to build on and plug into these safety protocols. In traditional IT environments, confidentiality is often prioritised. Here, safety and availability are critical. Changing the mindset, and adopting safety-related principles (like ALARP: as low as resonantly practicable) and methods (like Bowtie to visualise cause and consequence relationships in incident scenarios) when managing risk is a step in the right direction.

Photo by Jonathan Cutrer.